RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05763
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His awarded Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM) be upgraded to the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His initial decoration request was for the BSM; however, it was downgraded to a JSCM without explanation. Nevertheless, his counterpart and subordinate were both awarded the BSM. Although the JSCM is a prestigious medal to be awarded after time served in Afghanistan, his supervisor did not believe the commendations were awarded correctly. Therefore, his supervisor submitted an appeal on his behalf, indicating that he had been a key player in a mass casualty event resulting from enemy indirect fire. However, the appeal was denied by the Air Force, once again without justification. Subsequently, he was notified that he was awarded a JSCM, with a First Oak Leaf Cluster. However, he had not deployed since receipt of the basic JSCM. As such, there appears to be a glitch in the system and he was awarded two medals for the same timeframe and unjustly denied the BSM.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5) during the matter under review.
On 9 May 12, by permanent order, the applicant was awarded the JSCM for meritorious achievement during the period of 23 Oct 11 to 12 Apr 12.
On 27 Sep 12, the applicant was honorably discharged, with a narrative reason for separation of Accept Commission or Warrant In Same Branch of Service. He was credited with 7 years, 3 months, and 27 days of total active service.
On 28 Sep 12, the applicant was commissioned in the Regular Air Force.
According to AFPC/DPSID, on 11 Oct 12, by permanent order, the applicant was awarded the JSCM (First Oak Leaf Cluster) for meritorious achievement during the period of 23 Oct 11 to 12 Apr 12.
On 26 Feb 13, the Director, Military Personnel Human Resources Directorate was notified that the applicant was awarded the JSCM, dated 9 May 12, and was subsequently awarded the JSCM (1OLC), dated 11 Oct 12, for the same act and period. In order to correct his official military records the later award must be revoked.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C and D.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. The Bronze Star Medal is awarded to any person who, after 6 Dec 41, while serving in any capacity with the Armed Forces of the United States, distinguished himself or herself by heroic or meritorious achievement or service; not involving participation in aerial flight, under specific circumstances. There is no evidence in the applicants record, nor did the applicant provide any official documentation verifying he or his chain of command attempted to exhaust administrative avenues by requesting reconsideration of the downgrade through the original award approval authority. In order to reasonably consider the applicants request, he needs to submit a recommendation for upgrade from someone with firsthand knowledge of the act/achievement preferably from someone within his chain of command at the time of the act/achievement, a proposed citation, and eyewitness statements.
In this case, the applicant was awarded the JSCM for the inclusive period from 23 Oct 11 to 12 Apr 12. He was subsequently awarded the JSCM (1OLC). This subsequent award constitutes dual recognition as it was awarded for the same act and inclusive period as the basic award of the JSCM. The only difference is that one award identifies the applicant as a member of the United States Army and the other as a member of the United States Air Force. An attempt has been made to contact the original award approval authority to have them revoke the JSCM (1OLC). Once the JSM (1OLC) has been revoked and our office receives the revocation, the JSCM (1OLC) will be removed from the applicants official military personnel record. To grant relief of the applicants request would be contrary to the criteria established by DoDM 1348.33, the Secretary of the Air Force, Chief of Staff, and/or the War Department.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.
SAF/MRBP recommends denial. After a thorough review of the applicants records, to include the supporting documentation, he has not provided official documentation from someone in his chain of command to recommend upgrade or justification as to why the decoration was approved as a JSCM. Therefore, upgrade is not appropriate.
A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit D.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
He is unable to access the files needed to substantiate his claim because many of the items listed in the respective citation is of a classified nature. However, he has provided significant references that may assist in the approval of his request. Specifically, he submitted an AF Form 77, Letter of Evaluation, with his initial application, indicating that he performed beyond his rank and was recommended for the Bronze Star Medal. Secondly, he has a letter from his first line supervisor verifying that his supervisors replacement did not include a significant event that potentially justifies his BSM award. Thirdly, he has a letter from the individual who submitted the original paperwork for the BSM. Lastly, he has provided copies of his subordinates approved BSM citations that were mentioned in both of the previously stated letters. The submitted substantiating evidence and facts should be considered in the decision to upgrade his JSCM to a BSM.
A complete copy of the applicants response is at Exhibit F.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The application was timely filed.
2. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not first pursued. To request an upgrade of the applicants JSCM to a BSM, he or his chain of command should attempt to exhaust administrative avenues by requesting reconsideration of the downgrade through the original award approval authority. In view of this, we find this application is not ripe for adjudication at this level, as there exists a subordinate level of appeal that has not first been depleted. Therefore, in view of the above, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that he has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to submitting his application to the AFBCMR; and the application will only be reconsidered upon exhausting all subordinate avenues of administrative relief.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05763 in Executive Session on 16 Oct 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Dec 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 24 Mar 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBP, dated 29 Apr 14.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Sep 14.
Exhibit C. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 Sep 14, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02456
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The DMSM will not be awarded for any period of service for which a Military Department medal is awarded. The applicant was recommended for a DMSM, not a BSM.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04235
Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicants entitlement to the Meritorious...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01359
The AFCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, below the grade of Colonel and foreign military personnel, who, while serving in any capacity with the Department of the Air Force after 28 Mar 58, distinguished themselves by outstanding achievement or meritorious service. The original award approval authority determined the AFCM was the appropriate award to recognize the applicant's outstanding achievement on 22 Mar 75. A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02624
While it is noted the applicants AF IMT 3994, Recommendation for Decoration Deployment/Contingency Operations, dated , does not mention the BSM, and the applicant does not have a recommendation for upgrade from someone with firsthand knowledge of the act/achievement, preferably from someone within his chain of command at the time of the act/achievement, a proposed citation, or eyewitness statements, AFPC/DPSIDR believed based on the MSM recommendation package the applicant's actions were at...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03248
DPPPWB advises that Air Force promotion policy dictates the closeout date of a decoration must be on or before the Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD) and the signature date of the DÉCOR-6, Request for Decoration Printout (RDP), must be before the date of selections for a cycle in question. Should the decoration be upgraded and the applicant promoted to the grade of MSgt with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 Sep 89, DPPPWB recommends the Board adjust the applicant’s retirement date to 31 Aug...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05892
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05892 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Airmans Medal (AmnM) for his heroic actions performed on 26 Sep 03. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01646
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01646 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 NOV 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant requests the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) covering the period 6 Apr 69 to 11 Feb 70, be upgraded to the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). On 24 Apr 01, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01781
The DMSM is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense to any active duty member of the United States Armed Forces who, after 3 Nov 1977, while serving in a joint activity distinguishes himself or herself by noncombat meritorious achievement or service. His former commander while deployed to Iraq informed him that he had submitted him for a higher decoration and feared his career would suffer if he requested reconsideration from AFOSI. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00061
After receiving an Article 15 subsequent to her deployment, the Air Force revoked the BSM and she was never issued the medal. Additionally, Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-22 requires an award be revoked if subsequent information is revealed that would not have warranted the award had it been known at the time of the award. The actions by the approval authority to revoke the BSM are correct and well within the regulations, as the applicants service during the inclusive award period was not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04444
All of the command post personnel received the BSM except him. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. Based on a review of the applicants record, DPSID was able to determine that the applicant should have been awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) for his service from 23 Mar 66 to 30 Apr 91.